Bond 'excited, humbled' by England role

Shane Bond discusses his appointment as bowling consultant for England’s Ashes campaign

Shashank Kishore28-Sep-2017Shane Bond, the former New Zealand fast bowler, will help plot Australia’s downfall during the Ashes by guiding England in a consultancy role. Bond is expected to link up with the England squad four weeks ahead of the Ashes opener in Brisbane starting November 23. Currently in India as head coach of New Zealand A, Bond, who described the series as the “pinnacle” of bilateral contests, took time off to chat with ESPNcricinfo on his upcoming assignment.How did the deal with England for the Ashes come about?
I was invited to the Champions Trophy as an ICC ambassador. I turned up there and caught up with Andrew Strauss, who I’d played quite a bit against. It was great to have a chat. I knew he was working as the director of cricket and was doing a good job. We chatted about cricket in general, what coaching looks like in the modern environment, the challenges they face and the challenges English cricket is faced with. We had a general discussion, and then I got contacted asking if I’d be interested in working with them. I’d read Ottis Gibson was moving on to another challenge, and Andrew asked me if I’d be interested.What was your reaction when it came out of the blue?
Exciting, humbling, scary….there was a whole range of emotions I faced at the time. But excitement was the main one. You hope you can make a difference. I’ll certainly go out there trying to. As I’ve said, the job of a coach is to make a player, and hopefully the team, better. You’ve got to think about how you are going to do that. I don’t know if any other Kiwi has had an opportunity to work in a series like that. I can’t wait! I know a number of the guys. Some of them not really well, but I’m really looking forward to building those relationships and hopefully see those boys have a really successful tour.From a neutral’s perspective, what elicits that excitement?
Even as a Kiwi, I grew up with Ashes being the pinnacle cricket event. I’ve watched videos and documentaries of Bodyline and the history of the Ashes. As a player at the time, I saw how cool the 2005 series. The opportunity to work with the England team for that series was particularly humbling when he [Strauss] asked me. I’m really looking forward to being a part of that England team.What is it that you’re most looking forward to?
There’s so much history, great stories and great performances that have gone on to build the tradition that the Ashes is. In my mind, that is still the pinnacle series in world cricket. The excitement that players have when they’re picked for the Ashes tells you what it means to be a part of it. Even from a fan’s perspective – you sense that it’s the ultimate. What I’m looking forward to the most is seeing all the other stuff around it – fans, support, pressure, media, the hype and being involved, getting a really close look at it will be cool for me. I’m really lucky to get an opportunity to be involved in that and hopefully be part of a successful team.Your thoughts on England’s attack: all bases covered?
There’s some experience there, isn’t it? I played against Jimmy [Anderson] and Stuart [Broad]. I know Ben Stokes from the IPL. I also know a number of the other players and coaching staff through my experiences in cricket, but actually it doesn’t matter what the make-up of the squad is. You just go on with the job you have to do. The fact that I have an understanding of those guys because I’ve seen them over a number of years is going to help, but again for me it’s about starting from scratch. I’ll have to first get the trust of the players.Is it a challenge to attain your goals in such short span as coach?
We’ve got four weeks leading into the first Test. That’s quite a long period of time – three or four first-class games. It’s certainly long enough to make a difference. If I didn’t think I could, I wouldn’t have accepted the role.Will it help to have first-hand view of a pink-ball game in India ahead of the Ashes Test?
The pink ball is a little bit different. It’s a shame that the game [India A v New Zealand A] is not at night, That changes the dynamics a little bit. But the job the bowlers have to do is exactly the same. Looking forward to the Ashes, there’s a pink-ball Test. Any experience you get with working something different and learn a little bit more about it is a learning opportunity.

The twists and turns of a gripping finale

The final at Lord’s was a fitting end to a memorable World Cup. Here is a look at five moments where the game changed direction

ESPNcricinfo staff23-Jul-2017Yadav’s twin strikes scupper England’s progressMithali Raj’s decision to turn to Poonam Yadav after 14 overs bore instant results, through a combination of good fortune and some good old legspinner’s drift. A full toss off her third ball had Tammy Beaumont miscuing into the leg side, after which she pinged Heather Knight’s pads with one that went straight on. A successful DRS review later, India had two of England’s best batsmen in the hut, just like that.Goswami’s middle-overs magicEngland were cruising at 144 for 3 in the 33rd over when Jhulan Goswami returned for her second – and final – spell. Her opening burst of 6-2-16-0 had stemmed the run flow early on, but was in no way portentous of what she would dish out in her final four overs. A faint tickle down the leg side got rid of Sarah Taylor first up, before a cracking yorker-length delivery undid Fran Wilson first ball. Four overs and 18 runs later, another ripper trapped Nat Sciver in front. England’s batting core had been dismantled single-handedly, leaving them at a precarious 164 for 6 after 38 overs.Raj’s bizarre run outFor a chase that needed a steady hand more than fireworks with the bat, Raj’s wicket was the one England would have wanted the most. They got it far more easily than they would have imagined, as she ran herself out in a bizarre fashion. Punam Raut’s nudge to short midwicket was met with a clear affirmative from her captain at the other end, before she gave up halfway through the run, leaving her well short of the crease – there was not even a desperate dive for the line. It was as if she did not expect the throw to come to her end, and it left India without an anchor for their chase.England’s reaction after Mithali Raj’s run out tells a story•Getty ImagesEngland’s senior pros miss simple chancesSarah Taylor’s probably the best keeper going around in women’s cricket, as she showed towards the end of India’s innings with quick glovework to get rid of Shikha Pandey. Earlier on, though, she missed a stumping that would have been a regulation chance by her standards. With India needing 84 off 92 balls, Raut was beaten by a Laura Marsh turner. But Taylor failed to pick the path of the delivery too, and the missed stumping seemed like it would prove costly for England.Two overs later, Heather Knight had a “dropped the cup” moment at extra cover, grassing a crunchy Veda Krishnamurthy cover drive which went straight into her hands and out. In a matter of balls, England seemed to be losing the plot, as India looked set to cruise home on their lucky day.Krishnamurthy’s swipe ends India’s hopesDespite those missed chances, India were wobbling and, with 29 needed off 33 balls, Krishnamurthy’s ball-striking abilities were critical to their chances. She had flirted with danger throughout her short stay, and each one of her risks seemed to be paying off till that point. She eventually perished by the sword, as her cross-batted slog settled into Sciver’s palms this time. It was the third of Anya Shrubsole’s six wickets, as lady luck finally deserted Krishnamurthy and India.

India's seven-batsman army didn't work

Aakash Chopra on the talking points from Australia’s victory in the second T20 international in Guwahati

Aakash Chopra11-Oct-20170:58

Pitch was perfect for Behrendorff – Bhuvneshwar

The pitch at the Barsapara stadium
The surface in Guwahati had a deep-brown look that suggested a lot of moisture. There was also an even covering of grass, which allowed the ball to grip the pitch and move laterally. The toss was critical and Australia did the right thing by choosing to field, after which Jason Behrendorff proved the value of a left-arm seamer. His natural angle – moving away from the right-hand batsman – accounted for Manish Pandey, and deliveries that came in got Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli. Behrendorff reaped rewards for his fuller length.India’s shot selection
In the first ODI, Pandey had fallen for a duck, nicking a full ball from Nathan Coulter-Nile. In Guwahati, Pandey stayed deep in the crease and was fortunate that Coulter-Nile rarely pitched full. Behrendorff, however, did pitch full and Pandey’s front foot went down the pitch instead of towards the ball. He reached out for it with his hands and edged behind. Shikhar Dhawan had spent all but one ball in the first three overs at the non-striker’s end, giving him ample time to assess the conditions. So the shot he played to fall to Behrendorff – an attempted chip over the infield – was careless.Dhoni’s footwork
The moisture in the pitch ensured the ball gripped and turned for the legspinner Adam Zampa. MS Dhoni tried to counter this threat by stepping out: in the over that he was eventually dismissed, Dhoni stepped out to Zampa five times. The idea was to force the bowler to shorten the length, which would allow Dhoni the freedom to stay in the crease and score off the back foot. It was interesting that Dhoni chose to step out – sometimes only to defend – to five consecutive balls without waiting on the back foot even once.Seven-batsmen army
India have been picking seven batsmen in recent limited-overs games, the idea being to have extra firepower to set above-par totals or chase huge targets. It is also insurance against a collapse. The strategy hasn’t always worked in ODIs with scores of 300, and even in Guwahati having Hardik Pandya at No. 7 did not prevent India from being dismissed in 20 overs. Playing the extra batsman also leaves you a bowler short, leaving no insurance for a bowler having a bad day. With the kind of batsmen India have, playing five proper bowlers is a tactic worth trying.The Warner-Finch dismissals & Henriques’ promotion
Most of the runs scored on this pitch were off the back foot and that led to Australia’s openers being a little too eager. David Warner and Aaron Finch went back to balls that weren’t short enough and paid the price. Australia were smart to promote Moises Henriques to no. 3, ahead of Glenn Maxwell. The conditions demanded a more technically sound batsman.India’s bowling plans
Travis Head and Henriques went after the left-arm wristspinner Kuldeep Yadav and medium-pacer Hardik Pandya. Every time Kuldeep pitched full, which is his strength, both batsmen went really hard at it. He was forced to bowl shorter and, on a slow Guwahati pitch, the ball sat up to be hit. The experience should encourage Kuldeep to expand his repertoire. From time to time, the situation will arise where he needs to bowl quicker and with control.It was interesting that Kohli did not bowl Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jasprit Bumrah in the middle overs despite Kuldeep going for plenty. Yes, it would have meant not having their overs at the end, but the only way to fight back was to break the Henriques-Head stand and take more wickets. As it turned out, with Australia winning in the 16th over, neither Bumrah nor Bhuvneshwar bowled their full quota.

Kohli joint-fastest to 50 international tons

Kohli’s second-innings hundred was his ninth in 2017. He has six more internationals this year to set a new record

Bharath Seervi20-Nov-201750 – Number of international hundreds for Virat Kohli. He became the eighth batsman overall and second Indian, after Sachin Tendulkar, to get there. Kohli got there in his 348th innings, in Kolkata on Monday, the joint-quickest along with Hashim Amla, who got there in February 2017.2 – Number of third-innings centuries for Kohli in Tests. Both have come in successive third innings outings against Sri Lanka. The first was an unbeaten 103 in Galle earlier this year. Before these two knocks, Kohli averaged 27.12 in the third innings across 25 knocks, with four half-centuries. The last India captain to score a third-innings century before Kohli was Tendulkar, who did so against New Zealand in Mohali in 1999. The previous India player to score a third-innings century at Eden Gardens was Rahul Dravid, against Pakistan in 2005.83 – Kohli’s run tally across six Test innings at Eden Gardens before this century. He was out for single digits in four of those innings. In ODIs, he has a century and three fifties in six innings here.119 – Balls taken by Kohli to score this century – his fastest of the 18 Test hundreds. The previous quickest was off 129 balls against New Zealand in Wellington in 2013-14. Kohli scored 68.87% of batsmen runs since he arrived to the crease – 104 out of 151 – at a strike rate of 87.39. While the other batsmen contributed 47 runs at strike rate of 31.92.

Distribution of runs after Kohli’s arrival in the third innings

Batsman Runs Balls SR 4s/6sVirat Kohli 104 119 87.39 12/2All others 47 147 31.97 5/09 – Number of hundreds for Kohli across formats this year – three in Tests and six in ODIs – the most by him in any calendar year. He made eight hundreds, his previous best, in 2012 and 2014.0 – No captain has made more international hundreds in a year than Kohli’s nine this year. Ricky Ponting (2005 and 2006) and Graeme Smith (2006) also made nine hundreds. Kohli still has six internationals left this year to set a new record.1 – Kohli is the first India captain to score a duck and a century in the same Test. He’s the 18th captain overall to do so. Last India player to do so was Cheteshwar Pujara, also against Sri Lanka, in Colombo (SSC) in 2015. The last instance of an Indian doing this at home was Dravid, against England in Mohali in 2008.

Didn't bat, didn't bowl, didn't catch – but we won!

How many players have really not troubled the scorers in a Test victory?

Steven Lynch28-Aug-2018England won the Lord’s Test even though one of the team, Adil Rashid, did not bat, bowl or take a catch. How often has this happened? asked Andrew Curry from England
Adil Rashid’s fruitless return at Lord’s has been replicated on 13 previous occasions in Tests. Remarkably, it happened twice to the Australian left-arm seamer Bill Johnston in the West Indies in 1954-55: in the third Test in Georgetown and the fifth one in Kingston, the unfortunate Johnston was injured in the field before he had a chance to bowl, and took no further part in either match. These were the last two of Johnston’s 40 Tests.The first man to emerge victorious in a Test despite a minimal personal contribution was the future England captain Percy Chapman. At Lord’s in 1924, his batting was not required as England ran up 531 for 2, and he did not bowl or take a catch in South Africa’s innings of 273 and 240.R Ashwin top-scored in both India’s innings at Lord’s from No. 8. Was this unique? asked Trefor Jones from England
Rather surprisingly perhaps, R Ashwin’s double in the second Test at Lord’s was the fifth time that the No. 8 batsman top-scored in both a side’s innings in a Test. The first instance was in Bangalore in 1995-96, when Lee Germon top-scored in both New Zealand’s innings against India. This was Germon’s Test debut – and he was captaining the side, too. Guy Whittall followed suit for Zimbabwe against South Africa in Bloemfontein in 1999-2000, and another Zimbabwean, Graeme Cremer, achieved the feat against Sri Lanka in Harare in 2016-17. There was another instance in Hamilton in 2008-09, when Daniel Vettori top-scored from No. 8 in New Zealand’s first innings against India, and Brendon McCullum – down the order after a nightwatchman was used – did likewise in the second.Jimmy Anderson inflicted two pairs on Indian batsmen at Lord’s. Has anyone else managed this in a Test? asked Gavin McDonald from Australia
Jimmy Anderson disposed of the luckless M Vijay and Kuldeep Yadav for ducks in both innings at Lord’s recently. Only three previous bowlers have previously inflicted two pairs in the same Test. The Australian legspinner Bill O’Reilly accounted for the New Zealanders Gordon Rowe (bowled twice) and Len Butterfield (lbw twice) in Wellington in 1945-46. Jim Laker did it during his demolition of Australia at Old Trafford in 1956 – Neil Harvey and Ken Mackay (who was caught by Alan Oakman in both innings). And finally Dale Steyn did it against New Zealand in Centurion in 2007-08, when his victims were Mark Gillespie (on his Test debut) and Iain O’Brien.Iain O’Brien, along with Mark Gillespie, was dismissed for a pair by Dale Steyn in Centurion, 2007-08•Getty ImagesWho is the youngest man to take five wickets in an innings in a Test? And who’s the oldest? asked Manoj Pandit from India
The youngest man to claim a Test five-for was the Pakistan slow left-armer Nasim-ul-Ghani, who was 16 years 307 days old when he took 5 for 116 against West Indies in Georgetown in 1957-58. Around a fortnight later he took 6 for 67 in Port-of-Spain. Next comes Mohammad Amir, who was 17 years 260 days old when he took 5 for 79 for Pakistan against Australia in Melbourne in 2009-10.The oldest bowler to claim a five-for was the Australian left-arm spinner Bert Ironmonger, who was within sight of his 50th birthday – 49 years 311 days old – when he took 5 for 6 and 6 for 18 against South Africa on a treacherous pitch in Melbourne in 1931-32. Next comes another Australian spinner, Don Blackie, whose offbreaks brought him 6 for 94 against England in Melbourne in 1928-29, when he was 46. More recently, 45-year-old John Traicos took 5 for 86 in Zimbabwe’s inaugural Test, against India in Harare in 1992-93.Apparently only one man has scored a century and also scored a try at Headingley. Who is it? Liam Botham perhaps? asked Ben Gordon from England
I don’t think Liam Botham managed it, even though he did play both cricket and rugby league at Headingley. The only man known to have done this particular double is an Australian, Arthur Clues, who was one of the first imports into English rugby league after the Second World War. He scored 74 tries for Leeds, many of them at Headingley. Clues was also a talented cricketer, who had played top-class club cricket in Australia. He died in 1998, and his obituary in The Independent recalled: “During his rugby career, he also played for Leeds Cricket Club, on the cricket ground that adjoins the rugby pitch at Headingley. He is the only man to have scored a try on one side of the shared grandstand and century on the other. He is also recalled as an exceptional tennis player, a keen golfer and an Australian yo-yo champion.”Use our feedback form or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

India 'not good enough', says Virat Kohli, as England seal 2-1 series win

Team needs to pick up performances in time for 2019 World Cup, says captain

Nagraj Gollapudi at Headingley17-Jul-2018India are not ready for the World Cup. Not yet. That is the conclusion drawn by India’s captain Virat Kohli, who believes his team have “quite a few” questions to answer between now and the 2019 tournament, after England won the last two ODIs to seal the series 2-1 at Headingley.After a second demoralising defeat in three days, Kohli said that India were “not good enough” and needed to pick up their performances in the intervening 12 months.After a subdued batting performance had received strong condemnation from India’s fans at Lord’s on Saturday, Kohli’s men failed in all three departments in Leeds. And despite an honest appraisal of their shortcomings, Kohli did not exactly spell out what areas they needed to work on to be ready for the World Cup.”Well, quite a few,” Kohli told the host broadcaster during the post-match presentation in Leeds. “That is what every side is looking for: they are looking for the best balance they can have possibly. All these sort of series and these sort of losses will tell us exactly what we need to work on and the things we need to rectify come World Cup time.”Kohli’s assessment had been echoed by India’s batting coach Sanjay Bangar, who had pointed out on Monday that the team still had enough matches between now and the World Cup to work out their unsettled roles.”We have got 15-16 games. We have to get our act right and get the balance of the side really powerful and strong and make sure we are not over-reliant on one skill. [All] three skills have to come along together and have consistent performances and that is what we are striving for as a team.”Kohli was the only India batsman today to score a half-century. Rohit Sharma went early once again and Shikhar Dhawan was unfortunate to be run out after he was beaten by the spectacular fielding and throw from Ben Stokes. Dinesh Karthik, drafted in in place of KL Rahul, hit a couple of breezy fours, but paid the price for attempting a drive far from his body against Adil Rashid.Suresh Raina and Hardik Pandya once again failed to stitch together a partnership with MS Dhoni, who cursed himself later for picking the wrong ball to attack after another cautious start to his innings. India managed 258.”We were never on the mark as far as the runs on the board was concerned, we were 25-30 less,” said Kohli. “England were really clinical with the ball, bat and the field as well. We were just not good enough.”Kohli said he was surprised with the behaviour of the pitch which was slow throughout the day. He said initially with the new ball it had been two-paced but subsequently became slow, helping the spin twins of Rashid and Moeen Ali.”They suffocated us through the middle overs really well,” Kohli said. “And the two spinners again joining hands and bowling 20 overs together. They really bowled well in partnerships. That is what you need as a side – you need bowlers to step up and bowl in partnerships. None of them got greedy, they just kept containing the runs and got the results eventually.”

Toss advantage > home advantage?

India have had a rough year trying to dismiss tails, but how much of a difference did batting first make in Adelaide? Quite significant

Sidharth Monga in Adelaide08-Dec-2018If you have agonised over India coming close and not winning on the tours of South Africa and England this year, you probably watched the Adelaide Oval Test from behind your sofa once India got into Australia’s lower order. All those memories of stubborn lower-order runs would have come storming back with every over a lower-order wicket didn’t fall.How has Virat Kohli fared this year at the toss?•ESPNcricinfo LtdA lot has been written, said and tweeted about India’s ability to dislodge tails. From Cape Town to Birmingham, from Centurion to Southampton, India’s conservative approach against the lower order has been identified by many, including the team management themselves, as the failure to “seize big moments”. Virat Kohli has marvelled at the opposition allrounders’ clear minds and fearless batting.Yet, a lot of this fear might have disregarded something significant but so obvious that it can be lost. All the lower-order resistance against India came with the opposition ahead in the game, not necessarily on balance but on runs, any runs. When Sam Curran began his onslaught at Edgbaston, England were effectively only 100 for 6, but they were not in deficit, and they were going to make India chase something, anything. South Africa’s lower order rallied in Cape Town and Centurion when they were ahead on runs. In Southampton, England might have given up a first-innings lead, but the complexion of the game changed as soon as they drew level again even though they had lost a wicket by then.

Home advantage is arguably bigger than it has ever been in Test cricket, but the advantage from winning the toss and batting first hardly gets analysed that much. Perhaps because the athletes are too proud to talk about luck. However, in Test cricket today, there seems no way back for a side batting second and falling behind or drawing level or even taking an insignificant lead. Not counting beating Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and West Indies, the last time a side batting second won a Test despite falling behind was back in 2015 when New Zealand overturned a 55-run deficit against Sri Lanka in Hamilton. The last time an away side managed this feat – again not in Zimbabwe, Bangladesh or the West Indies – was back in 2008, when South Africa chased down 414 at the WACA Ground.As a comparison, sides batting first are far likelier to overturn a first-innings deficit. New Zealand did it twice in the recently concluded series against Pakistan. England did it against Sri Lanka in Kandy and against India in Southampton. India themselves came back from a deficit in Johannesburg, just as they did against Australia in Bengaluru. The cliché that Test cricket gives you a second chance applies almost exclusively to sides batting first these days; at least in Tests between fairly evenly matches sides at any rate.There has been a clear and consistent dip in the win-loss ratio of sides fielding first in Test cricket. Most of the years, with the odd exception, the ratio hovered between 0.8 and 1.2, but starting 2014, it has been 0.5, 0.48, 0.48, 0.54, and 0.31 in 2018. Hence you really have to question England’s decision to insert India in at Nottingham earlier this year. Hence you also need to be a little sympathetic towards India’s away record in 2018. This is only the second toss they have won in nine. They won the first match (in Johannesburg), and are in a situation where they should back themselves to win the second.

This begs the question if toss advantage – rather bat-first advantage – is more significant than home advantage. Over the same last five years, the win-loss ratio for away sides has been 0.5, 0.6, 0.61, 0.46, and 0.48 in 2018. There isn’t much between the two then. There is reason to believe they might be both just as significant. If you look through that prism, India faced the double whammy of home and toss advantage in seven of their nine away Tests this year. In one of those, England were merciful enough to ask India to bat, an opportunity India cashed in on. The Lord’s insertion was done in freakish conditions, one of the rarest of rare scenarios in which you opt to bowl first in modern Test cricket.If India go ahead and achieve the win they are favourites for in Adelaide, they will have shown they have been good enough to cash in on every opportunity presented to them. At home, they won 4-0 despite fielding first four times out of five against England in 2016. Prior to that, in 2013, they blanked Australia 4-0 despite fielding first in all matches. That they can nullify the toss advantage at home, and encash almost every time they have the advantage away is precisely why the tag of the best Test side in the world is well earned.Let’s try to look at what this bat-first advantage translated into on the field in Adelaide. The criticism of India in letting lower-order partnerships flourish has been the spread-out fields for the set batsman. In this innings, India only sent out one extra boundary rider than they normally would for Travis Head. They were much more willing to take a risk here. In the absence of the fear of batting last, India were much more enterprising.Virat Kohli and Tim Paine pose with the Border-Gavaskar Trophy ahead of the first Test•Getty ImagesDuring the said matches that India conceded too many runs to the lower order, it isn’t as if India’s lower order didn’t score runs. Kohli and the tail did that in Birmingham, Cheteshwar Pujara did so in Southampton to even get them the first-innings lead; Kohli had sizeable partnerships with R Ashwin and Ishant Sharma in Centurion, but they were batting last in those matches. That was the difference.This won’t be a pleasant notion for many Test cricket romantics, for a Test win is built on so many small things going right. To suggest that something based on dumb luck probably has a bigger bearing on the result than all those small factors put together can’t be that palatable. But that’s where Test cricket today is, especially when two evenly matched sides are involved.These were two really unlucky sides coming into Adelaide. India had lost seven out of their last eight away tosses. Australia had lost 11 of their last 14 tosses. Somebody had to get lucky. It was just as well that India did because home and toss advantage has been a lethal combination. In this Test at least, toss advantage seems to be trumping home advantage even after a below-par first innings. You’d dearly love to be proven wrong, but chances are high that this series between these evenly matched sides might just be decided by who is batting first more often.

Six decisive factors in Zimbabwe's famous win

Several different things – from the toss to various on-field performances – fell in place for the visitors in Sylhet

Liam Brickhill06-Nov-2018Zimbabwe completed a remarkable turnaround to snatch a victory in their first Test of the year, having endured a torrid, winless streak in limited-overs cricket since the World Cup Qualifiers in March. While their white-ball cricket has suffered from inconsistent performances, the change in format against Bangladesh came along with successful contributions in virtually every department. Here are the six key factors that set up Zimbabwe’s first away win in 17 years:

Regis Chakabva’s wicketkeeping

Regis Chakabva hasn’t played an ODI for Zimbabwe in three years but he’s a Test regular, having played in nine of their last 13 games, and is widely regarded as one of the finest wicketkeepers in the country. Chakabva kept himself busy playing club cricket in Kent’s Premier League over the English summer while Zimbabwe were playing limited-overs cricket, taking 13 catches and three stumpings for Sandwich Town while also topping their batting tables with three centuries. He didn’t appear the slightest bit rusty at the top level during Zimbabwe’s 151-run win in Sylhet. He batted out 150 balls to stretch Zimbabwe’s two innings but, as would be hoped of a specialist ‘keeper, he also put in a quality performance behind the stumps. He let just 11 byes past him over the whole Test and took six catches, three of those off the spinners in conditions where the ball turned and bounced prodigiously.

The seamers’ control

Everyone thought the Sylhet surface would turn, and it did, but Zimbabwe gained their first advantage with the ball through the fast bowlers. The combination – or ‘synergy’, as bowling coach Douglas Hondo put it – of Kyle Jarvis and Tendai Chatara brought six wickets in the match but, perhaps even more importantly, their discipline and control with new and old ball allowed Zimbabwe to keep themselves in the hunt even when when wickets weren’t coming. Their early spells on the second day turned the game, setting up Zimbabwe’s first-innings lead of 139, and they kept things tight thereafter, racking up a combined 13 maidens and not conceding a single no-ball or wide.

Success against left-arm spin

Suggesting that Zimbabwe’s success had anything to do with how they combated the home spinners when those spinners shared 19 wickets in the game might at first appear to be a bit of a tough sell, but consider this: Taijul Islam had to toil for more than 68 overs for his 11-wicket match haul, and Zimbabwe’s patience with the bat meant they were able to stretch their two innings out for more than 182 overs in total. The collapses against spin that have haunted their previous tours to Bangladesh were staved off by a willingness to play patient, attritional cricket, and the first-innings contributions from Sean Williams and Peter Moor were exemplary in this regard. Both are natural strokemakers, but they dug in to face 173 and 192 deliveries each in the first innings, setting up the rest of the match after Zimbabwe had opted to bat first at the toss.

Winning the toss

Speaking of the toss, on a pitch that turned almost from the first day, this was a lucky one to win – particularly as the coin has not been falling in captain Hamilton Masakadza’s favour recently. He called incorrectly three times in a row in the preceding ODIs, contributing to the severity of Zimbabwe’s defeats as they had to deal with evening dew, and also saw the coin fall on the wrong side three times out of five on their previous tour to South Africa in October. That he got it right this time around meant Bangladesh were left facing the daunting task of batting last, bringing Zimbabwe’s spin attack right into the game on a wearing fourth-day pitch.

The spinners’ incisions

With allrounders Sikandar Raza and Sean Williams in their line-up, alongside debutants Brandon Mavuta and Wellington Masakadza, Zimbabwe had a varied, spin-heavy attack to wear Bangladesh down, and then knock them out. While Williams’ golden arm was used sparingly, Raza was a workhorse, bowling 17 overs in a row during a marathon two-hour spell on the fourth morning and collecting six wickets in the game. When Mavuta and Masakadza struggled for rhythm in the first innings, Zimbabwe had the cushion of their experienced spinners to fall back on, and Raza’s hard work in the second innings was a major factor in the build-up of pressure that allowed Mavuta and Masakadza to shine on the final afternoon.

Bangladesh’s batting woes

Bangladesh’s capitulation for 169 in the second innings marked the eighth successive Test innings in which they failed to reach 200, but what really stands out is how their batting malaise is only a feature in Tests. Bangladesh’s batsmen have had a fantastic year, just not in this format, and having played 12 ODIs since August, it soon became apparent that they were still batting in one-day mode in their first innings four days ago, something that Chatara said Zimbabwe had been expecting. Balls that might easily have been left alone instead brought wickets, and when the going got tough on day four, wickets tumbled amid a flurry of shots. The patience with which Zimbabwe had gone about their batting was completely lacking.

Outclassed and out-fought … England's boy racers run out of road

England played it their way … and crashed straight into a West Indies team ready for the sucker-punch

George Dobell in Antigua02-Feb-2019If you kept driving your car into a tree, you wouldn’t expect your insurance company – or the police – to be pacified by the response “but that’s the way I drive”.And if you kept setting fire to your house, you might think twice about cooking with paraffin.But England’s batsmen seem reluctant to accept change. Whatever the pitch, whatever the match situation, they appear to think that attack is the best form of defence.Antiguan roads are not especially wonderful. They contain the sort of pot-holes which can swallow a family-sized car. But you wonder if, each day, Trevor Bayliss sits upfront with the team’s bus driver urging him to go faster in a bid to reach the ground before the pot-holes can get them.In this game, England were given a perfect example of how to negate these conditions by West Indies’ batsmen. Both Kraigg Brathwaite and Darren Bravo prospered by playing straight, refusing to follow or chase the ball and being prepared to resist for long, scoreless periods during which they had to jab the bat down on the ones which kept low and tried to keep the hands below the deliveries that reared.At one stage Bravo – not so long ago a T20 specialist – went 174 balls between boundaries. His half-century – believed to be the slowest (in terms of minutes) in Test history by a West Indies batsman – was painstaking, but it also took this game beyond England. It was a masterclass in denial and selflessness for the team cause.England’s batsmen seem either unwilling or unable to replicate such an attitude. They won’t – in general – dare to be dull or bore to draw. They react to every challenge (with one or two exceptions, such as the Ben Stokes-Jos Buttler rearguard against India at Trent Bridge) by trying to hit the ball harder, further and faster. Is this really because they believe it is the best way to prosper in such circumstances? Or because they don’t trust their defensive games?Either way, this is an episode that raises more questions about the coaching standards within the England team – who has improved in this environment, after all? – and the structure of county cricket. It is hard to imagine there has been a time in the history of English cricket when there has been such a dearth of top-order batsmen and openers, in particular.When you add to that the lack of fast bowlers and quality spinners and you are left with a domestic system – squeezed into spring and autumn, as it is – that is simply not delivering enough players of Test quality. It might be noted, however, that it is delivering limited-overs players. It’s not hard to see where the ECB’s priorities have led us.Perhaps this isn’t entirely fair. Joe Root, for example, received almost impossible deliveries in both innings, while Joe Denly was out leaving a ball. England have also been outgunned in this series – just as they were in the Ashes in Australia – by tall fast bowlers who hit the pitch harder and gained more from it as a result. They bowled straighter, too, claiming nine wickets with bowled or leg-before dismissals, while England claimed just one; albeit in one fewer innings.England dropped several chances, too. It’s not all the batsmen’s fault, by any means. West Indies have, in all departments, outplayed England.But the point remains valid. Too many England players are putting too low a value on their wickets. Buttler (who was punished for playing across the line) has one century from 30 Tests; Bairstow (who missed a lavish drive) has been bowled 29 times in his Test career – that’s 29 times out of 102 dismissals; more than any Test batsman this decade – and Stokes’ Test average is now down to 32.88. Stokes (bowled off an inside edge while driving) hasn’t scored a Test century since the incident in Bristol and has averaged 24.83 in that period; it was 35.72 before.Moeen Ali, meanwhile, has seen his Test batting average drop to 30.28, Rory Burns wasted a solid-looking start to his innings by guiding a cut to the slips cordon as obligingly as if he had been asked to provide catching practice and, without being unkind, Denly was fortunate not to make a pair having been reprieved by the umpire in the first innings and a dropped chance in the second. Suffice to say, he didn’t look the most convincing answer to England’s opening problems.This cannot be dismissed as an aberration. Not once in four innings this series have England reached even 250 and not once in Sri Lanka did they make 350. Only once in seven Tests in the English summer did they reach 400.We know this England batting line-up has some talent. But talent works best when it is allied to rigour and discipline. At present, this England set-up is looking a little too cosy, a little too forgiving. That dressing room – especially that batting line-up – could do with a dose of cold reality. It isn’t quite what it thinks it is. If they are going to insist ‘this is the way we play’ then England will need to find other players with a bit more sense and sophistication.

South Africa thrive on pace, spicy pitches and increased depth

Five takeaways from South Africa’s 3-0 Test whitewashing of Pakistan

Liam Brickhill15-Jan-2019Pace is pace, bru
South Africa has always been a fast bowling hotbed, and the current generation is in such good shape that Pakistan, well stocked with seamers themselves, were easily out-bowled. The main difference between the two attacks boiled down to one thing: pace. Pakistan’s quicks operated at around 135kph, while three out of four of the South African fast men were consistently 10kph quicker than that. True, Vernon Philander doesn’t need extreme pace to succeed, but it can’t hurt that his bowling partners had opposing batsmen ducking and weaving. Duanne Olivier, consistently the fastest bowler on either side despite the heaviness of his short-ball workload over three Tests in quick succession, also ended up as the leading wicket-taker in the series and proved the adage that “pace is pace, bru”.Bowler-friendly pitches make for great cricket
South Africa coach Ottis Gibson’s message to his batsmen was that 500 needn’t be their target on bowler-friendly pitches and, in a series where 400 was breached only once across 12 innings, the wider point for the cricket-watching public was that ball dominating bat can be just as exciting, or even more so, when compared to runs galore. There wasn’t a single session across the three Tests that didn’t demand the viewer’s attention. At times, batsmen thrived, but the bowlers were never out of the game and as a result this series was without the lulls that can afflict run-fests. Every run made had context, meaning and import.Duanne Olivier was irresistible while running through Pakistan•Associated PressSteyn’s still got it (and so does Amla)
When Dale Steyn left the field midway through the second day of the third Test, clutching his right shoulder and angrily thumping the side of the Wanderers tunnel, South Africa feared the worst. It has been a long road back to full health for Steyn, and another serious injury at this stage could have been disastrous. But he was back on the field after lunch, and in the second innings led the attack once more, bowling more overs than anyone else, and at serious pace too. Steyn, as his captain and coach have said recently, is a freak of nature, a once-in-a-generation athlete, and the fire in his eyes has not dimmed one iota. He will remain a force to be reckoned with both at the World Cup, and in Tests to follow as he sets his sights on 500 scalps. The whispers around the form of another of South Africa’s elder statesmen ahead of this series have also been firmly hushed: Hashim Amla remains as vital to South Africa’s plans as Steyn.Home is a fortress, winning away is the next step
South Africa have now won seven Test series in a row at home, but it’s been almost two years since they last won an away series, against New Zealand. Since then, South Africa lost in England, albeit with a depleted side, and then floundered in Sri Lanka. This is undoubtedly a formidable Test team in their own conditions, and their rise to No. 2 in the Test rankings has been hard earned and thoroughly deserved. Home is a fortress, but South Africa will need to start winning away as well to reach Test cricket’s summit, and re-visit the heights set when they remained unbeaten away from home from October 2007 to November 2015. After the World Cup, they have a trip to India – currently ranked Test cricket’s No. 1 side – to look forward to in October. South Africa’s ability to adapt and compete in that series will be a true marker of their progress and standing.Temba Bavuma acknowledges the applause•AFPSouth Africa are building depth
When South Africa were struggling through their tour of England in 2017, missing not only AB de Villiers but also a slew of other players through injury, a feeling started to grow that the domestic system was not producing the ready-made Test cricketers it once had, and that the shallowness of their stocks was being exposed. South Africa lost the Basil D’Oliveira trophy, but gained the services of Gibson after that tour, and one of his first acts as national coach was to set in motion a programme to groom the country’s fast bowling talent. Fast forward a year, and the increased depth and strength of their quicks is plain to see. Importantly, moves have been made in other areas too. Theunis de Bruyn’s century in Sri Lanka last year showed his mettle, while Temba Bavuma has continued to develop into a world-class pressure-absorber in the middle order, Aiden Markram is the real deal, and Zubayr Hamza gave a glimpse of what he may be capable of in his debut innings.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus