Bangladesh tail swings against Sri Lanka to bring relief

Bangladesh have shown glimpses of improved lower-order batting in the past week against Sri Lanka. First, it was big-hitting from Rishad Hossain and Taskin Ahmed in the third T20I in Sylhet on March 9. Then Taskin repeated his batting contribution in the second ODI in Chattogram on Friday, helping Towhid Hridoy to get to a career-best unbeaten 96 to help Bangladesh past a middle-order slowdown.Hridoy added 50 runs in the last 3.5 overs with Taskin, who struck two fours and a six in his unbeaten 10-ball 18. Taskin had also struck three fours and two sixes in the T20I on March 9, while Rishad blasted a record seven sixes.On Friday, newcomer Tanzim Hasan Sakib also supported Hridoy, for the seventh wicket. They added 47 through sensible strike rotation. Tanzim made 18 off 33 balls, at a time when Bangladesh had just lost Mehidy Hasan Miraz, their last recognised batter.Related

  • Bangladesh drop Litton from squad for third Sri Lanka ODI

  • The up-and-down fortunes of Litton and Soumya

  • Tanzim seizes spotlight as latest star of Bangladesh's pace revolution

Hridoy said that he finds the Bangladesh lower-order to be capable of handling both types of batting. He is confident enough in them to give them back the strike, he said. “I don’t consider them as tail-enders. I see them as batters. They are proving their capabilities. I have belief in them.”They batted well. I told them that keep a positive intent. Hit whenever you see fit. Taskin asked me if he should give me the strike. I told him that he should go for his shots too.”Runs in the death overs often have big impact. Team gets a lot of confidence when they bat well. I had good partnerships with both Sakib and Taskin . It is always good for the team.”Tanzim said that he regrets getting out – a flay that only reached mid-off in the 47th over – as he wanted to hang around with Hridoy till the last over. “I tried to support Hridoy with the bat. My plan was to charge towards the end of the innings. I wasn’t satisfied with the way I got out. I should played that type of shot two overs later. It could have given us more runs.”Hridoy just told me to play sensibly. He said not to worry about dot balls, he can cover it in the end. I was picking the singles. We have a great bond. We know each other very well. It always helps in the field.”Bangladesh have struggled with a long tail ever since they decided to play with six specialist batters and Mehidy at No. 7. He had long batted at No. 8 in all formats to prolong the batting order but because of his batting improvements, the Bangladesh team management decided to risk playing five full bowlers. Even in the absence of allrounder Shakib Al Hasan, they have gone with five specialist bowlers. And now their trust in the tail doing their bit with the bat when needed finally seems to be paying off.

Dhawan suffers shoulder injury, out for 'at least seven' days

Sam Curran stood in as Punjab Kings captain in Dhawan’s absence against Rajasthan Royals

ESPNcricinfo staff14-Apr-2024

Shikhar Dhawan is set to miss Punjab Kings’ next two games, against Mumbai Indians and Gujarat Titans•Associated Press

Shikhar Dhawan has a shoulder injury, Punjab Kings coach Sanjay Bangar has confirmed, and could be out of action for a week, possibly, or even more. If it’s a week, Dhawan, the designated captain of the team, could miss two IPL 2024 matches, against Mumbai Indians (April 18) and against Gujarat Titans (April 21), both at home in Mullanpur.Speaking a press conference after Kings’ last-over defeat in a low-scoring game against Rajasthan Royals in Mullanpur, Bangar first said Dhawan could be out for “at least a couple of days”, and that it could be “at least seven-ten days”.”He’s having a shoulder injury, so he is likely to be out for at least a couple of days, I would say,” Bangar said. “Having an experienced opener, somebody like Shikhar, who has experience of playing on such wickets, becomes extremely crucial [for the team].”We have to wait and see how he responds to the treatment. At the moment, it seems that he could be out of action for at least seven-ten days.”In Dhawan’s absence, Sam Curran walked out for the toss for Kings, which led to some amount of confusion, since Jitesh Sharma had attended the captains’ conference in Chennai prior to the start of the season.”No, no, he [Jitesh] wasn’t the designated vice-captain,” Bangar clarified when asked the question. “The impression could have been because he attended the captains’ seminar, or meeting, at the start of the IPL. But the thought was always that… because Sam has led the team in the previous year as well; he was late to arrive from UK and he wanted to have a few [training] sessions, that’s the reason we couldn’t send him to Chennai. Hence Jitesh was sent, because the directive was that a player has to attend.”It wasn’t the case that Jitesh was the stand-in captain. We were very clear in our mind that if at all there had to be an opening, Sam Curran will be taking over and do the job as the captain.”Dhawan hasn’t had a spectacular time of it with the bat in IPL 2024, but is Kings’ highest run-getter at this stage with 152 runs from five innings, scoring at an average of 30.40 and a strike rate of 125.61. In fact, Kings’ struggles with the bat at the top of the innings have contributed in a major way to their lack of wins – they have four losses from six games so far and are down at eighth place on the table.Jonny Bairstow, Dhawan’s opening partner, has had a rough time too, scoring just 96 runs in six innings, while Prabhsimran Singh (119 runs in six innings) and Jitesh (106 runs in six innings) have struggled for consistency and impact also.On Saturday, with Dhawan out, Kings tried Atharva Taide at the top. He scored 15 runs in 12 balls as Kings put up 38 for 1 in the powerplay on their way to a total of 147 for 8.”Certainly is a cause for concern that the top order is not making enough runs for us,” Bangar said. “They are trying hard – I am not saying that they are not applying themselves – but it’s just not coming. Low-scoring games, especially at Mullanpur, the way the wicket is… that also has a factor. Because if you see, some of the scores have been pretty low.”All the three games that we have played here, in the first six overs, with the new ball, the wicket tends to just jag a little bit, and uneven bounce as well. So maybe that is also a contributing factor because, not only us, the visiting teams and their top order are facing issues.”

Rohit, Jadeja tons and Sarfaraz's 62 drag India out of trouble on day one

Sarfaraz’s 66-ball innings lit up the afternoon but ended in heartbreak after he was run-out with Jadeja seeking a 100th run

Sidharth Monga15-Feb-20242:41

Manjrekar: Rohit’s mental toughness was admirable

On the first day of the third Test, India’s batting finally came together but not without an early alarm. Down at 33 for 3 on a pitch that was full of runs and with two debutants to follow, India were looking at possible trouble. But a 204-run partnership between Rohit Sharma and Ravindra Jadeja for the fourth wicket – India’s first century stand of the series – took them to 326 for 5 at stumps. Rohit and Jadeja got centuries while Sarfaraz Khan made a sparkling debut, hitting 62 off 66, before being run-out.This was the first time since 1999 that India had three players in the top seven who had played fewer than two Tests. That in mind, Mark Wood gave England a leg-up when he got rid of Yashasvi Jaiswal and Shubman Gill – India’s only centurions this series before Thursday- with the new ball. Gill, in particular, got a ball that swung in and then nipped away, that took the outside edge. These two scalps doubled Wood’s tally of wickets in the first six overs of a Test innings.The early-morning moisture that had assisted Wood possibly helped Tom Hartley grip one in his ninth over, which took the front edge from Rajat Patidar. A day before the Test, Jadeja had said England were not a difficult side to beat. The team management asked him to go out and demonstrate it from No. 5 in the ninth over, the second-earliest he has walked in to bat in a Test innings, and the earliest in the first innings.Related

  • How Bazball alters one of the fundamental truths of Test cricket

  • Stokes does captaincy his way to set himself apart as England's greatest

  • Live Report: Ind vs Eng, 3rd Test, 1st day

A promotion to Jadeja made double sense: protect the debutant Sarfaraz and also introduce a left-hand batter. Coming back from possibly the first time he has missed a Test with a hamstring injury, and having to deal with a family dispute gone public, Jadeja would have been excused for having a lot on his mind when he joined Rohit, but he batted with the most unencumbered mind: just purely reacting to the next ball in an old-school fashion.Rohit, who had got off to a smashing start, had to do unconventional things at the start of the partnership. Wood tried to bounce him with a fine leg, a deep backward square leg and a deep forward square leg. For once, looking at the score and the situation, he decided not to hook and had to wear one in his helmet grille. He charged at James Anderson to cut down the movement, on one occasion chipping one just out of mid-on’s reach. With Hartley, he flicked in the air and against the turn. The first attempt brought four, the second an edge to slip, which Joe Root dropped.Mark Wood was the pick of the England bowlers on the opening day•BCCI

Rohit will argue this was just the luck he needed after the lack of it in the first two Tests. By then, the early movement had begun to die down. Just after that miscued chip off Anderson, Rohit went back to punch him through extra cover for four, an emphatic sign that he was in.Jadeja never looked less than in. The two took India to lunch without further bother. Just after lunch, Rohit became the 14th man in this series to hit a six. The added responsibility of being the leader of an inexperienced line-up had messed with his approach a little, but now though, we were seeing the usual Rohit. There were timely lofts, some paddle sweeps, and a lot of back-foot runs. His second six took him past MS Dhoni’s 78, with Virender Sehwag as the only Indian ahead of him.Once there was spin from both ends, Jadeja began to catch up too, hitting a six in the final over of the middle session, the first wicketless session of the series. Immediately after tea, Rohit brought up his 11th hundred with two easy couples off two short balls from Rehan Ahmed. For a long time, the team management would have hoped for the batters to not take risks and just benefit from the inevitable loose balls the inexperienced spin attack was bound to dish up. A little like how Rohit brought up his hundred.It was happening now with ease, especially for Jadeja. England had to go back to Wood’s pace. A top edge from Jadeja cleared long leg, who was 20 yards in off the fence. Rohit was getting freebies from Rehan. Fifty runs came in 11 overs after tea without having to break a sweat. Then Rohit pulled one off Wood that was probably not short enough to pull. It skidded on, got big on him, and was caught at midwicket.Sarfaraz Khan picked the lengths early against spin•AFP/Getty Images

Out came Sarfaraz with whispers already around his game against quick short-pitched bowling. That Wood began with a deep fine third, two men deep on the hook, a short leg and a catching forward square leg suggested it was not a mere whisper. Around the wicket he went and looked to bounce Sarfaraz. He ducked the first three nonchalantly. Towards the end of his spell, Wood insisted on one more over. Sarfaraz ducked again before bunting the surprise yorker down the ground.With pace out of the way, Sarfaraz displayed remarkable skill against spin, helped no doubt by Ben Stokes’ attacking fields. A series of one-twos followed: a loft over the infield followed by going deep into the crease to take a single off the seemingly inevitable shorter delivery. The feet moved perfectly according to the trajectory of the ball, the sweep was out early, and the lofts down the ground were executed perfectly. Before one realised, Sarfaraz had a fifty off 48, the joint second-quickest for an India debutant.Another byplay had begun to develop. Jadeja had got stuck in the 80s and 90s. In the time that Sarfaraz scored 50, Jadeja had got only 12. He had three hundreds, but four dismissals between 80 and 99. He almost became passive. Had Hartley reviewed his lbw shout against Jadeja, he would have got him out lbw pad-first on 93.Finally, on 99, Jadeja called Sarfaraz through for an impossible single and unsuccessfully sent him back. Looking at India still leaving the door ajar, Rohit threw his cap in disgust in the dressing room. Jadeja got to the hundred next ball, but the celebrations were subdued since Sarfaraz was gone just one delivery before. Jadeja knew there was more work to do on day two, walking back unbeaten on 110 with Kuldeep Yadav by his side.

Stoinis 'absolutely fine' with not getting a CA contract, still keen to play for Australia

Following his stunning IPL century, Marcus Stoinis says he still wants to play for Australia despite not being contracted for 2024-25

Alex Malcolm24-Apr-2024Marcus Stoinis has no qualms about missing out on a Cricket Australia contract for 2024-25 but is still keen to continue playing for Australia beyond the T20 World Cup after making a stunning statement century for Lucknow Super Giants in a victory over Chennai Super Kings in the IPL on Tuesday.Stoinis has not spoken since missing out on a CA contract for the 2024-25 but there is some nuance to the decision. He is still contracted with CA until June 30 as CA’s contracts run across the financial year. Barring injury, he was locked into Australia’s squad for the T20 World Cup even prior to his record innings at Chepauk on Tuesday. He has been a bedrock at No.5 in Australia’s T20I side as part of a settled middle-order alongside Glenn Maxwell, Tim David and Matthew Wade.Following his century at Chepauk, Stoinis was asked in the post-match presentation whether he had a point to prove but he was pragmatic about the situation.Related

Marcus Stoinis does the unthinkable and breaches fortress Chepauk

Stoinis makes highest score in an IPL chase as LSG score record win in Chennai

Stoinis and Agar lose CA deals while Bartlett earns full contract

Agar, Stoinis, Behrendorff and Tye go freelance without WA contracts

Stoinis to play SA20 after BBL, says ODI omission makes 'complete sense'

“I’ve got a great relationship with the [Australia] coach [Andrew McDonald],” Stoinis said. “Me not getting a contract, I knew that a while ago. I think it is great to give younger kids a crack and let them take my spot. I’m absolutely fine with that on the contract list. But on the playing front, obviously want to make sure that I’m there and that’s also why it’s so lucky for us and for me particularly to have this competition [the IPL], that’s why I love it so much.”Stoinis, 34, has been consistent in his statements about his contract situation and his desire to still play international cricket beyond the T20 World Cup. He said back in January he understood why he had been left out of Australia’s ODI squad to face West Indies. He has been in constant communication with McDonald and Australia’s chairman of selectors George Bailey about what his playing future will look like with Australia post the T20 World Cup as they build towards the 2025 Champions Trophy, the 2026 T20 World Cup and the 2027 ODI World Cup.Australia’s next limited-overs assignment after the T20 World Cup is in September in England, which includes five ODIs and three T20Is. They only have one other T20I series in the 2024-25 contract period, against Pakistan at home in November. They also have three ODIs against Pakistan in November, which is their last ODI series before the Champions Trophy.Stoinis has opted not to seek a state contract with Western Australia although he has not shut the door completely on playing domestic cricket in the future. However, his availability and opportunity will be dictated by his freelance schedule and WA’s desire for continuity within their program. Stoinis was one of four WA players who opted to go freelance instead of taking a state deal but Ashton Agar, Jason Behrendorff and AJ Tye are still set to be part of the WA program while Stoinis is unlikely to be. Stoinis has a strong relationship with WA’s state coach Adam Voges, who is with Stoinis at Lucknow as a coaching consultant, and further conversations will be held later in the year.

Inter Miami owner Jorge Mas calls MLS sanctions for skipping All-Star Game 'draconian,' claims Lionel Messi 'extremely upset' over league's one-game suspension

Mas defended Messi and Jordi Alba's ASG absences, claimed MLS's suspension rule is outdated and detrimental to the league

  • Messi, Alba suspended by MLS for skipping ASG
  • Miami owner Mas says Messi "extremely upset" over matter
  • Hopes suspension won't impact contract talks
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    Calling MLS rules for sanctioning players who skip its All-Star game "draconian," Inter Miami owner Jorge Mas on Friday said that Lionel Messi was "extremely upset' by the league's decision to suspend him and teammate Jordi Alba for their absences at Wednesday's midsummer event in Austin, Texas.

    Major League Soccer confirmed on Friday that both Messi and Alba have been suspended one match each for skipping the event, and neither will be available when Inter Miami host FC Cincinnati Saturday night. Per league policy, "any player who does not participate in the All-Star Game without prior approval from the league is ineligible to compete in their club’s next match."

    Mas claimed it was the club's decision to let both Messi and Alba skip the ASG, keeping their long-term health and fitness in mind amid a congested schedule, and that the players' were upset by the league's actions.

    “Obviously it was not a positive reaction,” Mas said of the players' response to the sanctions. “They want to compete. They want to play games. That’s what they’re here for: to play and win. They understand the magnitude of tomorrow’s night’s game. So the reaction was exactly as expected out of two competitive players who don’t understand the decision. Who don’t understand why not attending an exhibition match leads directly to a suspension. The rule is what it is, but they don’t understand it.”

    Mas said he was "hopeful" the discipline doesn't impact ongoing contract negotiations with Messi, who's current deal expires at the end of 2025.

    “He’s very upset, extremely upset today, as expected,” Mas said of Messi. “I’m hopeful it doesn’t have an impact long-term. Will it have an impact initially, in the players’ perception of how the league rules work? Absolutely no doubt.”

    MLS commissioner Don Garber praised Messi's overall contributions, but said the league had to follow its policies.

    “The most important thing is I know Leo Messi loves this league, and MLS is an entirely different league because of the years he’s been here helping to show the world what MLS is and what it’s capable of being,” Garber told the Athletic. “Nobody has done more for Major League Soccer than Lionel Messi. Not just what he’s done off the field, but what he’s done on the field. Every game is a must-see match. I fully understand and respect and admire his commitment to Inter Miami.

    "His decision is not one that I really can argue with whatsoever and I understand it. But unfortunately we have a longstanding policy relating to player participation in the All-Star Game and we had to enforce that policy. It was a very, very difficult decision, but one I hope both [Messi] and everyone else can understand and respect. He has shown up for his club, for his teammates, for our league time and time again and I respect his decision.”

    Garber added that MLS plans to re-evaluate the policy.

    “We are going to take a very hard look at the rule moving forward," he said. "It is important to all of our players and all of our fans that we have a policy that reflects and involves the realities of our league and its players going forward. I am committed to working with all of our players and to start working with Leo Messi to adapt this rule so it makes sense going forward.”

    Mas took exception to the All-Star Game participation requirements.

    “I think that the punishment for the rule is frankly draconian," Mas said. "I believe it’s a bad rule, but it’s a rule nonetheless. And it’s a bad rule because I think it puts the players in an untenable position to have to choose between participating in an All-Star festivity, which is an exhibition match, or choosing a regular-season game that I think matters. And I admire both Lionel and Jordi for always thinking of club first.”

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Mas said the league should have taken into consideration the congestion in Miami's schedule in making its ruling.

    “During the course of this year, we have to date played, already, 33 games,” he said. “I consider each and every game that Inter Miami plays an All-Star Game for obvious reasons. And I wanted today to express our full support, both to Lionel and to Jordi, as a decision for them to sit this week was a decision made by the club. And I think that that’s an important point.

    "They were coming off a run of nine games in 35 days. Hard games. The last two games previous to this Wednesday were games on the road on Wednesday at Cincinnati, on Saturday in New York. We’re facing a game tomorrow, and we’re facing a course of 10 games over the next 34 days."

    Mas added that the club and both players discussed traveling to Austin, but ultimately decided against it for "obvious reasons, because it would take away from their preparation."

    He admitted that "the communication on all ends probably wasn’t handled ideally" but added that “it was all a very short time frame.”

    Mas added he believes the current rule not only hurts the players, but the fans, the league and their media partner in Apple.

    “I allude to what the commissioner said in his statement, that the rule needs to be looked at,” Mas said. “I expressed our disagreement with the decision that the league made, and I had conversations with the commissioner this morning and through late last night. But notwithstanding that the decision is what it is and stands with MLS. But I want to assure everyone that you know, Lionel and Jordi have acted in a way commensurate with what the club would want.”

    He said he hopes that the league finds a way to make the All-Star Game a spectacle, without "forcing" players to choose between fitness and health for regular-season matches or attending the ASG itself.

    “I understand schedule congestion, but we have to find a way where the All-Star Game gives players some time before and/or after,” Mas said. “There are, I believe, six games this evening in Major League Soccer. That is less than 48 hours since playing in an All-Star game. That’s untenable and not right and not fair to the players and the clubs that sent players to the All-Star Game.

    "So the ideal situation would be that, either before or after the All-Star Game, as Javier Mascherano said this morning, the players have some days off so that they can enjoy their time at an All-Star Game. Because ultimately, it’s an exhibition, but it should be something enjoyable among players in Major League Soccer.”

  • WHAT MAS SAID

    Mas also backed Messi, saying the eight-time Ballon d'Or winner continues to elevate MLS on a global platform.

    “There’s no doubt that there’s a before and after Lionel Messi in this league,” Mas said. “Lionel Messi, he is different. He has completely changed the economics of this league, for every single club, every team, every sponsor, the league, media, etc. He’s important. But at the end of the day, Lionel Messi wants to play in competitive matches. … corporate sponsors are already taking advantage of Lionel Messi’s presence in the league, because they are league sponsors. So it’s a question of, how do you make the MLS All-Star Game an event that does not kill the management load on their physical ability to perform. You can still have players attend, and it’s a scheduling issue with that."

    Mas stressed that Messi's presence has a halo effect for the league, across a number of metrics.

    “Lionel Messi has created, for the first time in the league history, $10 million gates where he goes," he said. "Clubs change stadiums so Lionel Messi can perform and play, and Inter Miami can play. And that’s an amazing asset and an amazing thing for the league. I’m just hopeful that in the future we can manage the All-Star Game scheduling with the obvious benefits that Lionel has brought to our league.”

    Mas also noted that the South Beach club plans to make multiple additions this transfer window, and that they are looking to "take advantage" of the window to "strengthen our roster."

    The club has been heavily linked with a move for Argentina international Rodrigo De Paul, and the Atletico Madrid midfielder is reportedly close to finalizing a contract with the South Beach club.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT NEXT?

    Inter Miami takes on FC Cincinnati Saturday night. FCC currently sits atop the Supporters' Shield Standings and the top of the Eastern Conference. Last week they defeated Miami 3-0 at home.

Third-session fireworks

How Pakistan wrested the initiative in the final session

On the ball with S Rajesh and Arun Gopalakrishnan21-Jan-2006Going into the tea break, Pakistan’s total read 248 for 4. They had the runs on the board, but India had four top-order wickets, and on a flat pitch that was a pretty good effort. Then, in the final session, Pakistan snatched away whatever hope India had of ending the day on a high, thanks to a blistering attack by Shahid Afridi, primarily, and Inzamam-ul-Haq.The two put on 163 in a mere 32 overs, of which 131 came off 26 in the last session: Afridi contributed 66 from 61, while Inzamam’s share was 62 from 98. Rahul Dravid’s one hope was the second new ball, but the hope soon turned into a nightmare, as Afridi unleashed an assault of frightening proportions. Unbeaten on 43 off 60 when it was taken, Afridi smashed 42 from his 24 opportunities with the new cherry to end on 85 from 84. The table below shows how he fared against each Indian bowler: Zaheer Khan was easily the best of the lot, while Irfan Pathan suffered the Afridi treatment, just as Harbhajan Singh had in the Lahore Test.

Afridi v Indian bowlers

Bowler Balls Runs Runs/ over

Irfan Pathan 6 20 20.00 RP Singh 11 17 9.27 Anil Kumble 28 31 6.64 Harbhajan Singh 12 6 3.00 Zaheer Khan 27 11 2.44 Total 84 85 6.07The most listless bowler on view was easily Pathan. Not only did he vanish for an astonishing 70 from 11 overs, he was utterly pedestrian, never even remotely threatening to take a wicket. Only 9% of the deliveries he bowled induced a false stroke from the batsmen, while for Zaheer it was 13%, and 15% for RP Singh.

Finding Faith

Yousuf Youhana’s conversion to Islam and a new identity – Mohammad Yousuf – illustrates the growing phenomenon of faith within the Pakistan team

Osman Samiuddin23-Sep-2005


Mohammad Yousuf: a batsman by any other name…
© Getty Images

During India’s tour to Pakistan last year, an Indian journalist asked an ex-player from the `80s with as much flippancy as seriousness why, in his time, Pakistan players didn’t feel the urge to exhibit their faith as openly as current members did. Having been tickled by a stream of pre- and post-match comments littered with traditional Islamic salutations and on-field celebrations of landmarks with a sajda (kneeling down in Muslim prayer), the query was justified. Suitably, the reply was simultaneously glib and revealing: “Clearly we weren’t good Muslims.”Certainly during his time and periods preceding it, public displays of religiosity at least (not its private practice) were absent. At one defining moment in its recent history, when Javed Miandad struck a leg-side full toss for six in Sharjah, Pakistan cricket had no overt religious commemoration of the event. Instead, Miandad and non-striker Tauseef Ahmed dashed off wildly, arms akimbo, as natural and impulsive a celebration as you could imagine.Six years later, at arguably a greater epochal moment in Melbourne, a handful of players knelt in sajda and offered thanks for winning the World Cup. Today, if you talk to any cricketer, on or off the record, replies will begin with and be bookended by a bismillah (“In the name of Allah” – it is a traditional recitation at the start of any Muslim act) or inshallah (“God Willing”). And now, with Yousuf Youhana’s conversion to Islam and a new identity – Mohammad Yousuf – the growing phenomenon of faith within the team finds its most intriguing example.It is difficult to say with any certainty how or why this gradual change has come about. Superficially, we can pinpoint key actors and factors. Saeed Anwar, after the traumatic death of his young daughter, turned to religion and spirituality and took to the Tableeghi Jamaat (missionaries), who practise a stricter adherence to the codes of Islam than most. Anwar’s influence spread among senior players such as Saqlain Mushtaq, Mushtaq Ahmed and Inzamam-ul-Haq and the group travel together regularly to Raiwind, a small town near Lahore, where the Tableeghis congregate for prayer and dialogue.Yousuf’s revelation that he had actually converted some time ago adds further credence to the theory that Anwar’s role has been crucial. Three years ago, during the World Cup, there were persistent rumours that he had converted under Anwar’s influence.Maybe too, in the spectre of match-fixing, there lies a compulsion towards religion. Sharda Ugra, senior editor with India Today, suggested in an article on the subject last year during India’s tour to Pakistan that “the post-match-fixing generation in Pakistan cricket is grappling with a `double burden’; as sportsmen not only are they under scrutiny for their professional conduct, they have also become characters in a public morality play, always vulnerable to being accused of match-fixing should they fail.”Tellingly, when Salim Malik was first accused by Rashid Latif and Basit Ali of match-fixing during the African jaunt of 1994-95, almost the first thing manager Intikhab Alam asked him to do was swear on the Quran that he wasn’t guilty of any such deed.


Saeed Anwar turned to religion in the final phase of his career
© Getty Images

But for younger or newer members of the team, who haven’t played with Anwar, scouring for the roots of their religiosity is a more difficult proposition. To an extent, conformism and peer pressure play a part. But a broad, not infallible, argument can also be drawn: as the socioeconomic and geographic composition of the team has altered so too has the inclination of the team towards religion.Where once the national team was sourced in large part of players from the metropolises of Karachi and Lahore, and where the leading figures were urbane and rounded personalities such as Asif Iqbal, Majid Khan and Imran Khan, this is no longer the case. In Pakistan’s last Test match, against the West Indies, only four members of the team were born in Lahore or Karachi.There will be some who will argue that in smaller towns, such as Sialkot and Sheikhupura, religion perhaps holds a greater significance in people’s lives than it does in Karachi or Lahore. Levels of education are poorer, fewer people are literate and because awareness is generally low, religious beliefs, orthodox and otherwise, assume an enhanced importance. Abdul Razzaq’s mysterious illness and dizzy spells during last year’s Australia tour is an example: apparently he was on a spinach-only diet that a pir (spiritual leader) had advised would make him stronger.But this assumption can be, and often is, countered by some Pakistani sociologists who rightly point to the higher incidence of sectarian-fuelled violence in cities like Karachi and Lahore that suggests the opposite to be true. This indicates, they say, that the importance of religion has grown in urban, rather than rural, Pakistan over the last decade or so.Maybe the development isn’t linked so much to changing demography as it is to changing times. Many Pakistanis will tell you that the country as a whole has increasingly come to identify itself in religious terms. When Pakistan came into being it wasn’t, after all, officially known as the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, as it is now. The gradual Islamisation of the country began towards the end of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s premiership in the mid-’70s. Bhutto declared Ahmadis non-Muslim, banned alcohol, shut down nightclubs and changed the weekly holiday from Sunday to Friday to appease the religious front.The subsequent policies of General Zia-ul Haq – he brought in the Shariah law (the Islamic legal system) – and the pre-eminence of Islamic political parties such as the new religious alliance under the banner of the MMA have since enhanced the process. But even here, it can be argued with some justification that the right wing Jamaat-e-Islami party held sway over Karachi’s politics through the ’60s and ’70s.In recent months, two of the more heated domestic debates have been whether or not to retain a column that asks you to identify your faith in the Pakistani passport (after much debate, the column has been retained) and the impending implementation of a Hisba bill in the North-West Frontier Province. The bill essentially puts forth yet another parallel legal Islamic system, one which liberal circles decry as an act of Talibanisation, so strict are its moral codes.Younger players in the current team are children of this era, unlike players such as Imran, Javed and even Akram. When Salman Butt says, as he did in a recent Wisden interview, “we are Muslims and we believe in Allah. We do whatever Islam says and we try to be what we are supposed to be. Religion is the complete code of life and we follow its guiding principles,” it is but natural for someone born in 1984, at the peak of Zia’s rule, to not just say it, but stress upon it.Ultimately, of course, there isn’t anything to suggest the trend really matters in terms of either performance or selection. It forms but an interesting aside in what is, intrinsically and traditionally, an interesting team.Cynics have speculated that Yousuf’s conversion was the derivative of the belief that being Christian would preclude his elevation to captaincy. Disregarding his credentials as captain, the more cynical would counter that having a Christian as captain of Pakistan, an Islamic country fighting a global war on terrorism and a domestic one on extremism, would in fact be an admirable international PR coup for the media-savvy President Musharraf, who also doubles as Patron-in-Chief of the PCB.In any case, Yousuf has denied that his aspiration to captaincy had any link with his decision. In a matter as personal as this, we must go by his word and nothing else, not speculation, rumour or the displeasure expressed by his very vocal family on the subject.

Warne wins the battle of the spinners

How Shane Warne saw through the guiles of Ashley Giles

On the ball with S Rajesh and Arun Gopalakrishnan13-Aug-2005Australia’s top order struggled to counter Ashley Giles on the second day, but Shane Warne won the battle of spinners quite handily in the two brief passages of play on the third day, admittedly with ample assistance from Geraint Jones. The specialist batsmen had failed quite miserably in their attempt to hit Giles off his length by advancing down the pitch, but Warne showed the more accomplished players how it could be done, smashing 33 from 14 balls. In all, he scored 48 from 55 balls off Giles, and in the process took his Old Trafford batting average up to an imposing 74.50. Now if only Warne could teach his mates how to bowl those ripping legbreaks and sliders.

Singles in the middle, and fours at the slog

The pitch was slow and the outfield fast. India tried five spinners and England a quintet of seamers. And the paths England and India tread to reach their scores of 226 and 230 were remarkably different

George Binoy31-Mar-2006In the end, the game turned out to be a low-scoring but tight contest. The pitch was slow and the outfield fast. India tried five spinners and England a quintet of seamers. And the paths England and India tread to reach their scores of 226 and 230 were remarkably different.England crawled to 13 for no loss in their first seven overs while India chopped 43 runs off their target in the same time. But while England picked up the pace with a flurry of boundaries and, more importantly, sustained the run-rate on a sluggish pitch by picking off singles and twos with tremendous ease, India hit a deep rut. England ran 95 singles in their innings while India had 79. Though, in terms of runs, the difference might not seem much, the singles kept England going while the lack of them caused India to struggle in the middle overs. Between overs eight and 20, England added 56 runs while India managed only 28. The following graphic shows the comparison between the teams between during that period.However, during the slog, England failed to increase the run-rate where India succeeded. In Kevin Pietersen, they had the perfect batsman to bash the ball and he obliged by carting Yuvraj Singh for a four and a six before holing out next ball. After his departure in the 43rd over, England found the fence on just one occasion as they added just 28 runs and lost five wickets in the last seven overs. For India, Suresh Raina and Mahendra Singh Dhoni bided their time, watching as the asking rate increased to beyond six an over, but never letting it get out of hand. It was their ability to put away the loose ball that kept India always in control of the chase. By the end of it, India had hit 23 fours and a six to England’s 16 fours and two sixes. The following graphic compares the scoring pattern of the two teams after the 40th over, a period in which India hit seven fours and a six and England just two fours and a six.

  • India won their 14th consecutive match chasing, equaling the record set by West Indies who won 14 straight chases between February 1985 and November 1986.
  • Kevin Pietersen reached 1000 ODI runs in his 21st innings and equaled Viv Richards as the fastest to the landmark.
  • Virender Sehwag’s 26 off 45 balls was his slowest innings for a score above 25. His strike rate of 57.77 is lower than the 34 off 58 balls against South Africa at Kingsmead in 2001-02.
  • England start off as firm favourites

    Though West Indies hold a 52-38 overall advantage in Tests, England have won ten of the last 12

    S Rajesh17-May-2007

    Steve Harmison has been in excellent form this season, and has a superb record against West Indies as well © Getty Images
    West Indies still hold a 52-38 advantage in Tests against England, but since 2000 they’ve seen their lead whittled away quite alarmingly: in the last 12 Tests between the two teams, England have won ten, while two have been drawn. West Indies’ last victory was in June 2000, when they thrashed England byby an innings and 93 runs at Edgbaston. (Click here for a summary of all England-West Indies Test series.)England will go into the series as favourites, and they won’t mind beginning the series at Lord’s either. The venue used to be an unlucky one for them: they lost 11 Tests and won four from 1984 to 1999, but the tide has turned in the new decade – they’ve won eight of their last 14 Tests here. (Click here for England’s results in all Lord’s Tests.) Lord’s has been a good venue for them against West Indies too – there was a period from 1963 to 1991 when England didn’t win a single Test against them at Lord’s, but since then they’ve won three in a row, including the last time in 2004 by a whopping 210 runs.Thanks to their pre-eminence in the decades gone by, though, West Indies hold most of the records in Tests between the two teams: the six top run-scorers and the seven top wicket-takers are all West Indians. Garry Sobers leads the run-getters’ chart with an aggregate of 3214 at an average of over 60, while Curtly Ambrose is on top of the bowlers’ ladder with 164 wickets at 18.79. (In fact Ambrose is the only non-Australian bowler to take more than 150 wickets against a specific opposition team; three Australians – Glenn McGrath, Shane Warne and Dennis Lillee – have achieved it, all against England.)Fortunately for England, the current crop of West Indians won’t evoke such fear. Ramnaresh Sarwan leads a team whose credentials aren’t exactly top-drawer – to start with, he himself hasn’t flourished in English conditions, averaging only 35.83 in 14 Test innings in England. The two other regulars in the West Indian batting line-up who have experience of playing in England before are Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Chris Gayle, and both have done much better, though: Chanderpaul averages 58.54 in 14 Test innings in England, but less than 35 against them at home; similarly, Gayle averages 44 in England, and only 26 against them in the West Indies.Gayle’s opening partner, Daren Ganga, hasn’t played a Test in England yet, but their combination at the top of the order has been pretty successful: they are the second-most successful opening pair for West Indies, in terms of partnership runs in Tests. They’ve put together 1627 runs at an average of 42.81, and are second only to the Gordon Greenidge-Desmond Haynes combination, which scored 6482 runs in Tests at an average of 47.31.England’s players are coming off a poor World Cup and a 5-0 drubbing in the Ashes, but they can heart from their recent domination of West Indies. Like England, Andrew Flintoff, their talismanic figure, has been in awful form too, but if his past record is anything to go by, he too should relish the opportunity to face West Indies – Flintoff averages 51.25 with the bat and 24.69 with the ball against them.The two other fast bowlers in the England attack will have fond memories of playing against West Indies too – Steve Harmison had a wretched Ashes series, but he’s back in form, as is evident from his 27 wickets in four first-class matches this season, and West Indies better beware: in eight Tests against them, Harmison has nabbed 40 wickets at 21.10 apiece, almost ten runs better than his career average. Matthew Hoggard hasn’t done badly either, his 29 wickets against West Indies coming at an average of 29.89. Among the three experienced West Indian batsmen batsmen, only Gayle has a good overall record against Harmison, Hoggard and Flinoff.

    West Indian batsmen versus Harmison, Hoggard and Flintoff

    Batsman Runs Balls Dismissals Average

    Ramnaresh Sarwan 237 493 13 18.23 Shivnarine Chanderpaul 286 608 8 35.75 Chris Gayle 419 514 9 46.56 The West Indian pace attack pale in comparison. Among the frontline fast bowlers, Corey Collymore and Fidel Edwards are the only ones to have played Tests against England, and both have struggled: Collymore has managed nine wickets in seven Tests at an average of 63, while Edwards’s 13 wickets have come at more than 50 apiece. A bigger threat might be Dwayne Bravo, whose 16 wickets in four Tests have come at an impressive average of 26.

    Game
    Register
    Service
    Bonus